Walker Prep

Walker Prep

Share this post

Walker Prep
Walker Prep
Digital SAT Reading Command of Evidence Answer Explanation: Bluebook Practice Test 1, Module 2, Question 12
SAT Reading & Writing Course

Digital SAT Reading Command of Evidence Answer Explanation: Bluebook Practice Test 1, Module 2, Question 12

In-depth explanations for correct and incorrect answers. Includes detailed diagramming guide. Corresponds to Module 2 (difficult), Question 12 of Official dSAT Practice Test 1 Reading & Writing.

Dave Walker's avatar
Dave Walker
Jan 10, 2024
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

Walker Prep
Walker Prep
Digital SAT Reading Command of Evidence Answer Explanation: Bluebook Practice Test 1, Module 2, Question 12
Share

Introduction

This answer explanation is for digital SAT Official Practice Test 1, Reading & Writing Module 2 (difficult version), Question 12, accessible through the College Board’s Bluebook app. To follow along, you’ll need to have a copy of the test open, as copyright restrictions prevent me from reprinting the full passage, question, and answer choices.

This is a tough question that many very smart students get wrong. The main reason this question is so challenging is that it involves a form of argument called a hypothetical syllogism. But, don’t worry: although this logical structure may be unfamiliar to you, it’s nothing you can’t master with a bit of study and practice. To find out how, read on!


Quiz Hacker Test Prep is the “skeleton key” that unlocks success on dSAT Reading & Writing. As a premium subscriber, you’ll learn all of the powerful strategies I teach my private test prep students, at just a fraction of the cost. Plus, you’ll get full access to my complete archive of expertly-crafted practice questions

Imagine the success you could achieve with these incredible test prep resources at your fingertips! Don’t miss out on this amazing opportunity to achieve your SAT dream score. Start succeeding on the dSAT now with a premium subscription!

Get free 7-day trial


While the College Board labels this a 'Command of Evidence Question,' I prefer the term 'Logical Operations: Support' (LO:S) Questions. Why rename question types? Because names are important. They’re like anchors in your mind. My classification system anchors the question types in the right place. They are more specific and descriptive, which helps in guiding your approach.

To get the most out of what follows, I strongly recommend first reading my strategy article on LO:S Questions. It introduces many of the concepts and techniques discussed in the explanation below.

Diagramming

As emphasized in my strategy articles, diagramming the argument in Logical Operations Questions is a powerful tool. This technique simplifies complex arguments, making them more manageable and reducing the risk of errors caused by trying to hold multiple details in mind all at once. For a comprehensive guide on different diagramming methods, refer to the strategy articles for LO:S and LO:W Questions.

The passage argument could be diagrammed as follows:

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Dave Walker
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share